IDF violates obligations “Double standard on Gaza”


IDF violates obligations “Double standard on Gaza” (editorial, WJW Aug. 7), distorts the obligations of Israel, and all parties to conflicts, to minimize civilian casualties in war. The choice is not, as you put it, between “worrying more about civilian losses” and “survival,” but in adhering to obligations under the Geneva Conventions to protect civilians during the conduct of war. That means discriminating between military and civilian objects, assuring that military means are proportionate to the objective and minimizing harm to civilians even where military targets are nearby. The evidence from Gaza is that the IDF violated these obligations by, for example, shelling in the vicinity of schools and hospitals. The fact that Hamas flouts the laws of war is no excuse for Israel to do likewise. Thus, the State Department and President Obama’s criticisms of IDF shelling of schools and hospitals did not hold Israel to a different or higher standard than the U.S. applies to itself and others. Aware of its obligations, the U.S. military has sought to avoid or reduce civilian casualties, for example in Afghanistan, such that incidents of civilian deaths become newsworthy and subject to investigation. Yes, the U.S. has committed violations of the laws of war in recent years, most notably in the torture of detainees, and they warrant condemnation.  But we have come a long way since Vietnam, where indiscriminate bombing as occurred there would today likely be considered off-limits as a war crime. As there is only one standard, when Israel – or the U.S. or any other country – violates the laws of war, resulting in grievous harm and death to civilians, it should be accountable. The State Department and the president were right to demand it, and so should we.


Never miss a story.
Sign up for our newsletter.
Email Address


  1. It is obvious that Rubenstein needs education on the nature of Islamic ideology that worships death as the path to heaven while civilized socieries worship life. He needs to understand that hamas is responsible for the dearhs of civilians includin hamas.s killings of palestinians of their own people when they protest to hamas and do not want hamas weapons stored in homes, hospitals, mosques and schools. Rubenstein is worried about the so-called rules of war, but ignores the barbaric use of these rules to try to destroy infidels, be they Jews or Chrisrtians

  2. I would have liked the writer to have spent the last seven years in cities and towns adjacent to Gaza and have been subjected daily and sometimes hourly to rocket attacks and cross boundary kidnapping and murderous expeditions by Hamas. Hamas has used UN installations, schools, hospitals and homes to store and fire rockets that have reached to Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. In the Hamas book there is no distinction between civilians and Hamas militants. Both are engaged inn the war against Israel and collateral damage when civilians stay in their houses in Gaza as rockets were fired from their domiciles is the price to be paid for their military support of Hamas.
    Incidentally your e-mail address as listed in the newspaper is not operational.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here