Letters | May 9, 2019

0

A Palestinian state, but not like Gaza or Lebanon

I appreciate Rabbi Fred Scherlinder Dobb’s support for Israel and share some of his concerns. (“What does it mean to be pro-Israel?” Voices, April 18). I do not support new settlement construction or unilateral annexation in the West Bank.


But he seriously oversteps when he seeks to define all skeptics of a two-state solution as not pro-Israel.

Even mainstream supporters of a Palestinian state acknowledged that such a state would be demilitarized. In this formulation, it was never fully a “state.” While I once supported such a “state-minus,” I no longer believe it is the only valid option for Israeli disengagement from Palestinian areas of the West Bank.

https://www.washingtonjewishweek.com/enewsletter/

Supporters of a Palestinian state in the “long term” need to explain precisely how such a state avoids becoming another Hezbollah-controlled territory as in south Lebanon or another extremist-controlled Gaza once independence is achieved. Enormous portions of Israel are now under a constant threat of devastating rocket fire on two fronts that Americans would not tolerate on their borders for one minute. What will prevent an independent Palestine from devolving into a third front, absent military intervention by Israel?

While confederation with Jordan may be a dormant concept, some arrangement that provides autonomy and as much self-rule as possible on the West Bank, consistent with the peace and security of neighboring states, needs to be explored. That should not be a state-minus, at least until proposed security arrangements are robust, of indefinite duration, and more than paper guarantees. Progressive Zionists could help by working for the disarming of Hamas.


MARK DISLER
Rockville

Never miss a story.
Sign up for our newsletter.
Email Address

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here